Robot Count

From RoboWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
Revision as of 14 April 2013 at 19:11.
The [/w/index.php?title=Talk:RoboRumble&offset=20130414191105&lqt_mustshow=3202 highlighted comment] was created in this revision.

I just did a head-count on the number of robots in each rumble (of only that weight class).

Which comes to this: 458 megabots 132 minibots 170 microbots 229 nanobots

I found that interesting, that there we're fewer mini and microbots then nanobots. Maybe a microbot (>250 + <750) only or minibot only (>750 + <1500) rumble would make those robots more interesting to develop.

    Chase07:00, 13 April 2013

    Thats interesting indeed, the 'Do the best you can with the least possible code' paradigm is challenging to a lot of people. My vote for an extra rumble would go to 'ExtendsRobot', although I know the winner will be kawigi.robot.Girl. I am not sure if such a rumble is possible, because I don't know if it can be (automatically) detected which base class is used.

      GrubbmGait13:09, 14 April 2013

      It could use the honor system, like the twinduelrumble.

        Sheldor19:08, 14 April 2013
         

        Yeah, that should be fine. And LiteRumble makes it super easy to start new rumbles. I'd also be a little interested in a perceptual rumble. I think RetroGirl would have a good chance at #1.

          Voidious19:11, 14 April 2013
           

          I noticed this a while ago.

          I don't think that it's a very big deal. After all, the minirumble is for all robots that have a codesize of less than 1500 bytes (including robots that have a codesize of less than 750 bytes, and robots that have a codesize of less than 250 bytes), and the same for the microrumble and nanorumble.

            Sheldor19:07, 14 April 2013
             
            Personal tools