Course evaluation

This course will be evaluated following Chalmers standard model. Your input is important for the further development of the course!

Course representatives for 2018

• Mehmet Atakan Serin (atakan “at” student.chalmers.se)
• Albin Hellqvist (albhel “at” student.chalmers.se)
• Albert Overland (overland “at” student.chalmers.se)
• Raphael Isemann (isemann “at” student.chalmers.se)

Midterm meeting notes from 2017

On the 26th of April 2017 we have had the midterm meeting. The following points were brought up during the meeting:

• Compared to the PLT course, this course offers less guidance.
• Having this course as a project course is appreciated.
• Nice that the ambition level can be decided during the run of the course.
• The testsuite is valued, it helps with the development of the compiler, and even gives an indication of the gathered points.
• The testsuite could be extended to check for a correct directory structure.
• Improve the testsuite such that zipped archives are also supported.
• Although not many people make use of the office hours, it is good to keep them anyway.
• The workload is fair.
• The project description is clear.
• The lectures work really well; there is a lot of interactivity and plenty of room for questions.