ss_branch

The model is defined as a so called S-system. The S-system formalism (Savageau 1976, Voit 2000) is based on approximating kinetic laws with multivariate power-law functions. A model consists of n non-linear ODEs and the generic form of equation i reads


Xi'(t) = αij=1..n Xj(t)gij - βij=1..n Xj(t)hij            

where X is a vector (length n) of variables, α and β are vectors (length n) of non-negative rate constants and g and h are matrices (n*n) of kinetic orders, that can be negative as well as positive.

The model was introduced by Voit (2000) and represents a branched pathway with four dependent variables, X1...X4, and one input variable X5.

The parameter values are:

i αi gi1 gi2 gi3 gi4 gi5 βi hi1 hi2 hi3 hi4 hi5
1 12     -0.8   1 10 0.5        
2 8 0.5         3   0.75      
3 3   0.75       5     0.5 0.2  
4 2 0.5         6       0.8  
5 Input

An empty element corresponds to 0.0. Each row corresponds to one ODE according to Eq. 1, e.g. the first row gives X1'(t) = 12*X3(t)-0.8 - 10*X1(t))0.5.

In most of the test problems, the input variable X5 is not explicitly considered, and hence, a reduced S-system can be used:

i αi gi1 gi2 gi3 gi4 βi hi1 hi2 hi3 hi4
1 12     -0.8   10 0.5      
2 8 0.5       3   0.75    
3 3   0.75     5     0.5 0.2
4 2 0.5       6       0.8

The system specification in the same format as the problem: ss_branch and ss_branch_5variables.

The system specification in SBML format: ss_branch.xml.

A simple Matlab script for simulating the system is given in ss_branch.m.

About the problems

ss_branch1 is presented in Voit and Almeida (2004).

ss_branch2 is preseneted in Marino and Voit (2006). Note that the hii's are non-zero initially, but that they are not constrained to positive values. They can hence be assigned zero along the identification procedure.

ss_branch3 is presented in Tucker and Moulton (2006).

ss_branch4 is presented in Kutalik et al.(2007).

ss_branch5 is presented in Kutalik et al. (2007). The same 4 experiments defined in ss_branch4 is used and Gaussian noise with a 2.5% standard deviation relative to the particular experimental value is added. Note that Kutalik et al. used 5% Gaussian noise but considered 4 replicates of each experiment. This corresponds to 2.5% noise and one replicate of each experiment.

ss_branch6 is presented in Gonzalez et al. (2007). Note that α1=20 in this problem.

pe_ss_branch4 is the same as ss_branch4 but with a fixed structure, i.e. a parameter estimation problem.

References

Gonzalez,O.R., Küper,C., Jung,K., Naval,P.C.Jr., Mendoza,E. (2007) Parameter estimation using Simulated Annealing for S-system models of biochemical networks. Bioinformatics, 23, 480-6. PMID:17038344

Kutalik,Z., Tucker,W., Moulton,V. (2007) S-system parameter estimation for noisy metabolic profiles using newton-flow analysis. IET Syst Biol., 1, 174-80. PMID:17591176

Marino,S., Voit,E.O. (2006) An automated procedure for the extraction of metabolic network information from time series data. J Bioinform Comput Biol., 4, 665-91. PMID:16960969

Savageau,M.A. (1976) Biochemical systems analysis: a study of function and design in molecular biology (Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass).

Tucker,W.,Moulton,V. (2006) Parameter reconstruction for biochemical networks using interval analysis, Reliable Computing, 12, 389-402. http://www.springerlink.com/content/r5252637515v1qq3/

Voit,E.O. (2000) Computational analysis of biochemical systems. A practical guide for biochemists and molecular biologists. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 176-184.

Voit,E.O.,Almeida,J. (2004) Decoupling dynamical systems for pathway identification from metabolic profiles. Bioinformatics, 20, 1670-81. PMID:14988125