Course evaluation
This course will be evaluated following
Chalmers
standard model. Your input is important for the
further development of the course!
Course evaluation meeting 2015-04-28
Overall, the course seems to be going very well.
- Emphasize more that PLT is a prerequisit for the course
- First deadline in the course should be earlier
- There has been some confusion about deadlines and whether it is possible to submit late. The deadline are firm.
- Extensions should all be submitted in one go. There has been some confusion about that.
- The fire submission system seems to be working very well. Only glitch is that there seems to be a problem with the ssl certificate.
- Lab submission for lab A went well and response was quick
- A suggestion for the oral exam is to have students present their project for five minutes before the questioning begins.
- The dates for the oral exam will be published shortly.
- There could be more information about how to debug using the llvm tool chain.
- Hard to find information about string encodings in llvm. For instance the A character in the string is not explained anywhere.