Title:

Authors:

Reviewer:

A summary of the paper:

[A few paragraphs summarizing the paper. This should include 1)
motivation, 2) description of the problem that the paper attempts to
solve, 3) the method that the paper proposes, and 4) the main
results. This part should not contain criticism but simply report what
the paper contains.]

Positive points about the paper:

[Is the problem timely? Is the method appealing? Are the main results
satisfactory? If it's a survey paper, does it succeed at giving a
useful picture of the area?]

Negative points about the paper:

[Is the problem timely? Is the method appealing? Are the main results
satisfactory? If it's a survey paper, does it succeed at giving a
useful picture of the area?]

What you did not understand:

[Explain what was confusing.]

What can be improved in the paper:

[Imagine you are a conference program committee member or a journal
editor. What would be your recommendations to the author(s) for
improving the paper?]

Lessons learned:

[Two-three points to take away from the paper.]